for a face you love to live in

Paramedical

An explanation of the usual mastectomy/ reconstruction process. Breast tissue is removed and an expander (which resembles a flattened beach ball) is placed under the chest muscle.  The incision is closed, and two weeks later, the surgeon begins to inject saline solution into the expander, which stretches the muscle and the skin.  The expansion continues at two-week intervals until the desired size is reached (one benefit of this process is being allowed to choose the new breast size)–this process takes about 3 months.  A second surgery removes the expander(s) and replaces each with an implant, usually silicone, since that is most lifelike.  A third, optional procedure pinches up a bit of skin to form the nipple point.  Finally, a tattoo is applied to resemble the areola.  This is what I do, using up to three colors.  (As you can see here, other options are possible.)   The entire process, from diagnosis to normalcy, takes about ten months to a year.  I’ve been there, and I am available to offer reassurance for those who face this experience.  Note:  Other surgical options are available.

After her reconstructive surgery, this client wanted a bit of body art to
commemorate a sister whom she lost to BC.

Recent News

Roanoke permanent makeup and paramedical clinic TBD in June

I plan to be back in Roanoke  soon, the date still to be determined (possibly June 15). The location is  Medical Grade Skin Care, Inc., 4523 Brambleton Avenue SW.  To make an appointment please contact Betsy McClearn at 540/774-3223.

New York Times: “Tattoos as Makeup? Read the Fine Print”

Thanks to a recent caller who referred to this article from February 2011.  It is a well-stated and apt warning for anyone considering permanent makeup, and, I believe, presents a more balanced report than the NPR story.   As noted before, I welcome all questions about my materials, my methods, and my qualifications.  Please read the About page on this website, which includes references to my training and to my relationship with the medical community and with highly respected, local aesthetic practitioners.  I frequently consult with them in the case of skin conditions and scar management, and I have been honored by their continuing referrals.

Responding to “Tattoo Ink Stained by Safety Concerns”

I’ve been alerted to a recent NPR story and its FDA reference.  Readers and listeners should make the distinction between tattoo inks and permanent makeup pigments–their formulas are very different; beyond that, I can’t comment on tattoo inks.  As others have pointed out, the same color compounds that are used in permanent makeup pigments are the ones used in food, which we ingest in far greater quantities, and prescription drugs.  They are approved for these uses, as well as in topical makeups that are applied every day.  To these are added either alcohol or distilled water (and sometimes glycerin), as vehicles for the pigments.

In answer to the question of pigment and MRI safety, I am not aware of any actual cases of MRI difficulties, and  I quote from my professional organization’s website (www.spcp.org):
” According to Dr. Frank Shellock of Tower Imaging in Los Angeles, CA, a top expert in MRI safety, [out of the thousands who have had permanent makeup applied], only a handful of people have reported minor problems around the eye area and no problems around the lip or brow area. … Test studies have confirmed that the ‘iron’ particles in pigment are too microscopic to react as true metal pieces but rather are more accurately compared with ‘metals’ which already exist microscopically in the body.”

Contact Me on Facebook!